Skip Navigation Links
 Home 
 Registration 
 Pre Registered 
  
 Personal page 
 Archive 
Scroll up
Scroll down
-
-
Scroll up
Scroll down
       XXII Annual Congress of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology        بـیــست و دومــیــن کنــگــره سـالیـانه انـجـمـن چـشـم پـزشـکی ایـــران
Skip Navigation Links
        صفحه اصلی
        ساختار همایش
        مکان برگزاری
        ثبت نام
        ثبت نام شدگان
         مقالات
        مقالات پذیرفته شده
        ارسال پوستر
        برنامه همایش
        تماس با ما
        صفحه شخصی
        جستجوی سخنران
        آرشیو سمينار سالهای گذشته
 
مقاله Abstract


Title: DMEK lenticule preparation using an air dissection technique: central versus peripheral injection
Author(s): Sepehr Feizi, Mohammad Ali Javadi
Presentation Type: Oral
Subject: Cornea
Others:
Presenting Author:
Name: Sepehr Feizi
Affiliation :(optional) Labbafinejad Hospital
E mail: sepehrfeizi@yahoo.com
Phone: 22546393
Mobile: 09122837429
Purpose:

To compared two sites of air injection to prepare donor lenticules for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

Methods:

Fifty-three human corneoscleral buttons from donors aged 4 to 65 years were used. Corneoscleral buttons were placed endothelial side up and a 27-gauge needle was inserted just outside Schwalbe’s line and advanced immediately beneath the endothelium. Air was injected centrally inside the 8-mm zone (group 1) or peripherally approximately 1 mm in front of the limbus (group 2). Air injection was continued to extend the DM detachment as far as possible into the corneal periphery. Comparisons of central versus peripheral air injection were performed for reproducibility, the rate of usable tissue, and the type and diameter of the acquired bubble.

Results:

The mean donor age was 38.1±13.2 years. A big bubble was achieved following central or peripheral air injection in all cases. A usable donor lenticule (≥8.0 mm) was achieved in 91.7% of cases in group 1 and 86.2% of cases in group 2 (P=0.67). Both injection sites were comparable with regard to the diameter of the achieved bubbles (9.67±2.12 mm versus 10.06±2.44 mm, respectively, P=0.53), the chance of complete DM detachment (41.7% versus 57.7%, respectively, P=0.26) and the risk of bubble bursting (4.2% versus 6.9%, respectively, P=0.86). The odds of a type-2 bubble increased by 11.74 for peripheral air injections compared to central injections (P=0.01).

Conclusion:

Both injection sites exhibited comparable rates of usable donor lenticules. However, peripheral air injection was more likely to yield stroma-free grafts.

Attachment:





Last News

  - بـیــست و دومــیــن کنــگــره سـالیـانه انـجـمـن چـشـم پـزشـکی ایـــران